I am a Poor, Disabled, Unemployed American Indian

The debate circulating around homosexual so-called “marriage” is one where one side wants to retain the traditional definition of marriage as between one man and one woman, and the other side wants to redefine marriage as something other than that.  Even when the voters at the state level have approved measures that would retain the traditional definition of marriage, some activist judges (homosexual judges as was the case in California) have thrown out the laws stating they are discriminatory because they gave rights to one group and not another.

Based upon the argument that each of us should be able to come up with our own definition for statuses in order to access certain benefits that we claim to have a right to,  I have decided that I am a poor, disabled, unemployed American Indian.  I know what you might think if you saw me or knew anything about me, that I am a middle-classed, healthy, gainfully employed caucasian but I am not.  How can that be you might ask?  Well, because people who are poor, disabled, unemployed, or are minorities are afforded benefits (rights) I don’t get as a middle-classed, healthy, gainfully employed caucasian so I’ve come up with my own definition for these statuses.  See how easy it is?  Now you try it.


Incoming search terms:

  • am poor and disabled
  • disabled with unemployed women in india
  • indian catholic blogs
Chad Simpson (397 Posts)

Chad is a Catholic blogger living in the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex who focuses on exposing the distortions, half-truths, and outright heresies of the liberal media. He adheres to the Magisterial teachings of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. He and his wife home school their three children and attend the Novus Ordo mass in Latin whenever possible.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “I am a Poor, Disabled, Unemployed American Indian”

  1. Billy says:

    I bet the “couples” would think that was “unfair” too…

  2. 1: Any couple, whether Gay or Straight, does not require a marriage license to have children … whether those children are adopted, created through artificial insemination or surrogacy, or produced by way of good old fashioned SEX.

    2: No couple is required to demonstrate the ability or even the willingness to have children as a prerequisite for obtaining a marriage license.

    3: In my lifetime alone the human population of the Earth has gone from 3 billion to 7 billion, so frankly I think a theoretical dearth of new babies would be the very LEAST of our problems right now.

    Ask ANY couple, Gay or Straight, why they want to get married. The answer will not be, “So we can make babies!” The reason couples marry is to make a solemn commitment, often in the presence of friends and family members, to the health, support, and well-being of one another. Those friends and family members subsequently provide encouragement for the couple to hold true to their vows.

    THAT’S what makes marriage a good thing. And there’s no reason for denying Gay couples that opportunity.

    As Judge Vaughn Walker said in the decision on California’s Prop. 8 Case: “Permitting same-sex couples to marry will not affect the number of opposite-sex couples who marry, divorce, cohabit, have children outside of marriage or otherwise affect the stability of opposite-sex marriages.” It was a view shared by the courts in the Golinski case against DOMA, where a Bush appointee in the Northern District of California concurred: “The exclusion of same-sex couples from the federal definition of marriage does nothing to encourage or strengthen opposite-sex marriages.”

Leave a Reply

Hide me
Sign up below to have the hottest Catholic news delivered to your email daily!
Enter your email address:
Show me