Baltimore archbishop rallies religious leaders in support of marriage

Baltimore, Md., Oct 6, 2012 / 07:01 am (CNA).- Archbishop William E. Lori of Baltimore last week told a large gathering of Maryland religious leaders opposed to Question 6 that it is urgent to organize voters opposed to the ballot measure, which would recognize “gay marriage” in the state.

“Those who are trying to redefine marriage are the politically powerful, and are raising money from Hollywood to Madison Avenue and throughout the country,” he said in his introductory comments at the Sept. 26 Interfaith Gathering on Marriage.

“What a powerful message it should send that so many people from so many faith traditions would gather together in this, the oldest Catholic seminary in the United States, in support of such a critical issue for our society.”
Over 200 attended the meeting at St. Mary’s Seminary in Baltimore. Catholic bishops from Maryland and nearby states joined Protestant, Evangelical, Mormon and Muslim leaders at the event.

The Orthodox Jewish community also supported the gathering, but did not attend because it coincided with the Jewish holy day of Yom Kippur. Rabbi Ariel Sadwin, a leading rabbi from Baltimore sent a message of solidarity.

Archbishop Lori said backers of traditional marriage have an “urgent” task. They must raise the funds to challenge the media campaign in favor of the referendum and they must get their allies to the voting booth. Catholics are contributing “significant financial support” and are organizing volunteers.

The archbishop said the defense of marriage is “a message that is profoundly good.”

He also observed that those of different faiths believe in marriage as “the unique relationship” between a man and a woman and in the “vital and unique role” that both mothers and fathers have in raising children. This relationship is “the foundation of all society” because it brings life into the world, he said.

“The union of man and woman, then, is not only a good for the couple but for the entire community of the Church and of humanity, for marriage serves as a model and a point of reference for all that God calls humanity to be,” Archbishop Lori stated.

On May 1, Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley signed into law a bill that recognizes “gay marriage” in the state. The bill passed the Maryland House of Delegates by a 72-67 vote and the Maryland Senate by a vote of 25-22.

Opponents of the bill turned in over 113,000 signatures to challenge the bill on the November ballot, about twice the number required by law. The successful petition drive means the law will not take effect until January 2013.

A vote in favor of Question 6 would recognize “gay marriage” in the state, while a vote against Question 6 would defeat the bill and preserve marriage as a union of a man and a woman.


Incoming search terms:

  • archbishop lori
  • Baltimore md
  • archbishop lori baltimore md
CNA Daily News - US (1502 Posts)

Readers Comments (1)

  1. Look at some of the common arguments used by people who oppose marriage equality for Gay couples:

    1: “We want to preserve the sanctity of marriage.”

    Sanctity is another word for sacredness or holiness. In other words, it’s a supernatural quality usually thought of as being bestowed by some sort of god. But it is not the job of government to make things sacred, or to enforce someone’s idea of Holy Law. The job of government is to enforce the Constitution, without regard to any specific religious view.

    2: “Children deserve to have a mother and a father.”

    This is not an argument against marriage equality as much as it is an argument against single parenting or adoption by Gay couples. The fact remains that procreation is irrelevant to this debate, since (1) couples do not need to marry to make babies, and (2) the ability or even desire to make babies is not a prerequisite for obtaining a marriage license.

    3: “If you allow Gay marriage, why stop there? Next thing it’ll be incest, polygamy, and God knows what else!”

    Yeah, and it also goes without saying that if you allow a man to marry ONE woman, you have to let him marry as many women as he wants. In reality, the only difference between a married Straight couple and a married Gay couple is the sexual orientation of the two people who have made the commitment. And unless the 14th Amendment applies only to people who are heterosexual, there’s no justification for denying law-abiding, taxpaying Gay couples the same legal benefits that Straight couples have always taken for granted.

    4: “If everyone was Gay, the human race would go extinct!”

    This is perhaps the most ludicrous and hysterical argument of all. The marriage equality movement has never been an effort to make homosexuality compulsory for everyone. Most people always have been and always will be heterosexual. Allowing Gay couples to marry will have ZERO effect on that.

    Let me reassure you: For people who are Straight (i.e. heterosexual), absolutely NOTHING about marriage is changing. Nothing is being “redefined.” Think your marriage or your family will suffer if the Gay couple down the street is allowed to marry? Think you’ll even NOTICE? Think again.

    The marriage equality movement is simply an acknowledgment that Gay people exist, and that there is no Constitutional justification for denying law-abiding, taxpaying Gay couples the same legal benefits and protections that Straight couples have always taken for granted.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


Hide me
Sign up below to have the hottest Catholic news delivered to your email daily!
Enter your email address:
Show me
Menu Title