Survey on priests’ dislike of Missal may be inaccurate

This is a syndicated post from CNA Daily News. [Read the original article...]

Hamden, Conn., May 25, 2013 / 04:03 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- A survey of U.S. priests' attitudes towards the new English translation of the Roman Missal showing “widespread skepticism” may be inaccurate because of its methods, according to a polling expert.

On May 21, St. John's School of Theology, located in Collegeville, Minn., released its survey results saying that the majority of priests in America dislike the new Missal.

Of the some 1,500 priests who responded to the survey, 39 percent like the new text, and 59 percent dislike it, according to the Collegeville survey.

“All 178 Roman Catholic Latin rite dioceses in the U.S. were invited to take part in this study; 32 dioceses participated…in the period February 21 – May 6, 2013, priests in participating dioceses were invited to participate in the online survey via an email to all priests on the diocesan distribution list,” according to the survey's executive summary.

Peter Brown, who is assistant director of Quinnipiac University's Polling Institute, discussed polling procedures with CNA May 23. “Random sampling is the key to getting accurate poll results,” he said.

Since only a few dioceses chose to participate in the survey – just under 18 percent – and only some priests in those dioceses chose to respond, survey respondents were “self-selecting.”

“They participated not randomly, but because they were the ones that chose to respond,” Brown explained. “Self-selected samples are not generally thought of….they don't produce a random sample.”

Since polls rely on a small number of people to represent the attitudes or beliefs of a larger population, “you have to be absolutely sure that the random group is a random group.”

The Collegeville survey, Brown said, “might not meet those criteria” since its participants were self-selecting.

“It's very difficult to know exactly” in this particular case, he added, though he had noted that self-selecting samples are generally not random.

The survey's project manager, Chase Becker, is a graduate student in liturgical studies at St. John's School of Theology, and holds a bachelor's degree in philosophy. No ostensible polling experts were involved, and the survey's professional consultant was an associate professor of psychology at the institution.

The poll also had no indication of its margin of error.

The survey's results were welcomed by vocal critics of the new translation, such as Bishop Donald W. Trautman, Erie's bishop emeritus. He said the texts of the new Missal are “unintelligible and non-proclaimable” and have “lengthy sentences.”

And Bishop Robert H. Brom of San Diego complained that opening prayers in the newly translated Missal are “especially difficult” and said the Missal has “strange vocabulary.”

Meanwhile, Monsignor Andrew Wadsworth, executive director of the group responsible for preparing the new Missal, noted that “the 1,536 priests who responded may represent less than 3.7 percent of priests in the US…a significant fact in determining just how representative this consultation can be considered.”

Jeffrey Tucker, director of publications at the Church Music Association of America, noted that the survey “lacks demographic data,” failing to break down priests' response by their age and other factors.

“I suspect a generational split is at work here. It shouldn't really be surprising that some priests of an older generation are annoyed,” he wrote May 21 at The Chant Café website. “They came (to) terms with one way, received vast amounts of catechesis along these lines, and developed a more casual liturgical style to go with it, and now they are told to do it another way.”

The new translation of the Missal, which has been in use since Nov. 27, 2011, is more faithful to the Latin original than was the translation in use since the 1970s.

In accord with a 2001 document on the implementation of Vatican II, the new translation is meant to be closer not only to the sense of the original Latin, but its structure as well, and is less informal than the 1970s translation.

A poll conducted by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate surveyed American Catholics, not only priests, about their perception of the new Missal last September. That poll showed that Catholics in the pews have overwhelmingly been positive about the new translation.

Seventy percent of those polled agreed that “the new translation of the Mass is a good thing.” And those who attend Mass at least weekly were even stronger in their approval, at 80 percent. The poll had a margin of err of plus or minus three percentage points.

(4)

The Ecumenical Movement In The Catholic Church: A Historical Review And Analysis

This is a syndicated post from Catholic Journal. [Read the original article...]

The Catholic Church has had a significant interest in the ecumenical movement since the Second Vatican Council of 1961 to 1965. This paper will present the history and analysis of the Catholic Church by examining the important historical topics of the ecumenical movement from a Catholic perspective.

Introduction

Ecumenism states that Jesus Christ founded only one Church at Pentecost. The Catholic position is that we are that one church and have followed the apostolic traditions passed down from Christ to his Bride, the Church. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishopsstates to fellow Christians at the celebration of the Mass: “We pray that our common baptism and the action of the Holy Spirit in this Eucharist will draw us closer to one another and begin to dispel the sad divisions that separate us. We pray these will lessen and finally disappear, in keeping with Christ’s prayer for us ‘that they may all be one’ (Jn 17:21).2”

Church unity is a gift from God, but it is something that must never be taken for granted. The Church must continue to pray and refine the unity that Christ has willed for her. We know this unity was upmost in Christ’s heart from His prayers at the passion; “…that they may all be one…so that the world may believe that you have sent me.” (Jn 17:21)2  The desire to call all Christians to unity is a gift of Christ and the work of the Holy Spirit (CCC #820).3

Early Ecumenism-Before the Second Vatican Council

Before the Second Vatican Council, ecumenism was defined as a relationship with other Christian groups for the goal of unity of the Church. The purpose of these relationships was to draw misguided Christians back to the Holy See to a unity that they had broken as a result of their disobedience to the Church.4  The duty of maintaining the unity of the Christian Church was considered imperative before the Second Vatican Council. As early as A.D. 1274 at the Council of Lyons and again in A.D. 1438 at the Council of Florence, the Eastern Churches developed a plan with Rome for reunion. The plans for unity from both councils were unsuccessful in convincing the leadership of the Eastern Churches to reunite with Rome.5

Although before the Second Vatican Council, the Church saw unity with separated fellow Christians as a premium duty, the Church had its main focus on rejecting what she saw as promiscuous and false in doctrine outside the Church. The Church cited violations in canon 1258 and the 1917 Code of Canon Law from other Christian groups and Churches that were not consistent with the teachings of the Bible or the Sacred Traditions of the Catholic Church. Canon law forbade the faithful to assist in, participate in or join in any non-Catholic religious service. Canon law allowed the faithful to passively attend or be merely present at non-Catholic funerals, weddings, and similar occasions provided there was no danger of perversion or scandals with the teachings of the Church.5

After the Second Vatican Council

The Second Vatican Council opened up a period where Catholics were not only able to explain the teachings of the Church to non-Catholics, but also to understand the spiritual perspectives of non-Catholic people. Pope John XXIII, who opened the Second Vatican Council, had the aim of extending an invitation to disenchanted Catholics and to non-Catholics to find the Christian unity for which Jesus so ardently prayed to His heavenly Father. The Second Vatican Council recognized that elements of salvation are found in other Churches, too, although the Catholic faith was still the one, holy, universal, and apostolic Church. In paragraph #8 of Lumen Gentium, the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church,the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council stated that the Church constituted and organized in the world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church. Many elements of sanctification and of truth are found outside of the Church’s visible structure. These elements, as gifts belonging to the Church of Christ, are powers impelling us towards catholic unity. 7

The Second Vatican Council acknowledged that many elements of sanctification may be found outside the Catholic Church. The gifts of the Spirit as evidence of God’s blessings belong to the Church of Christ and thus, press the issue of Christian unity. From the ecumenism of the Second Vatican Council, the Church seeks to reach out to other Christian faiths to find reconciliation at the highest level possible. For example, the Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church signed a joint declaration in 1999 on the doctrine of justification; Rome and the Anglican church have agreements on baptism, ministry, and the holy Eucharist. The Second Vatican changed the 1917 Code of Canon Law that forbade Catholic priests from cooperating with clergy of a different Christian faith. Canon 908 now allow allows Catholic priests to share in the sacraments of other Christians under defined circumstances, but the  concelebration of the Eucharist was not approved. “Christians may be encouraged to share in spiritual activities and resources, i.e., to share that spiritual heritage they have in common in a manner and to a degree appropriate to their present divided state.”8

Relationships with the Orthodox Churches

Catholic unity with the Orthodox Churches is the most likely of all the Christian Churches due to the similarity in doctrine. Within the Orthodox Churches, the communion and unity in faith is so identical to the Catholic Church, “that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord’s Eucharist.”9  Practical matters are more of a damper on full unity with the Orthodox Churches. The Church of Rome remains the largest single body of Christians in the world. The ultimate authority of the Pope and the absorption of the much smaller (an estimated 225–300 million people adherents of Orthodoxy that reflects approximately one-quarter to one-third the size of the Catholic Church) 10 Eastern Church by the Latin rite would cause the Orthodox Churches to lose much of her own autonomy.

Three divisions or rites are within the Orthodox Church: 1) the Byzantine, 2) The Pre-Chalcedonian, and 3) the Nestorian Churches. Of the 21 Ecumenical Councils of the Catholic Church, the Byzantine rite accepts the first seven, the Pre-Chalcedonians accept the first three and the Nestorian rite accepts the first two Ecumenical Councils. The Orthodox and Catholic differences occurred as far back as the Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431. The Council of Chalcedon  in A.D. 451  and the schism with Constantinople in A.D. 1054 were due to differences in nomenclature and not due to meaningful doctrinal issues. For example, two Churches- Roman and what would become the Nestorian Church- argued over the expression Mother of God versus Mother of Christ for the Virgin Mary at the Council of Ephesus in A.D. 431. The 1994 Common Christological Declaration between the Catholic Church and the Assyrian Church of the East (also known as the Nestorian Church) signed by Pope John Paul II and Mar Dinkha IV recognized the legitimacy and truth in the difference expressions of faith in each Church’s liturgical life and piety.11

Relationship with the Anglican Churches

Conflict between Rome and the Anglican Church arose due to King Henry VIII’s declaration of royal supremacy over the Church of England. Hostilities increased due to the confiscation of Catholic Church property by the Anglican Church, the dissolution of the English monasteries, the execution of priests, forced attendance at Anglican worship, and the mandated payment of tithes to the Anglican State Church. In 1560, the Anglican Church declared the Catholic faith illegal in England.12

During the reign of Mary I (A.D. 1553-1558) a brief restoration of communication with the Catholic Church occurred. Mary’s death marked the end of the Catholic attempt to reconcile by regulations the English and Catholic Churches. In 1570 Pope Pius V excommunicated Elizabeth I and authorized rebellion against Elizabeth I and English Catholics. The actions led to restrictive laws against the civil and religious rights of Catholics. Not until the Catholic Emancipation in A.D. 1829 did the legislative reform occur from the Elizabethan era. Still today, Catholics are prevented from marrying into the royal family.13

Apostolicae Curae

An edict of Pope Leo XIII issued in 1896 declared Anglican orders to be “absolutely null and utterly void.”14 In 1897, the Archbishop of Canterbury responded to the arguments in Apostolicae Curae with the publication of Saepius Officio.15   The invariable practice also of the Catholic Church supposed their invalidity, since, whenever clergymen who had received orders in the Anglican Church became converts, and desired to become priests in the Catholic Church, they have been unconditionally ordained. In recent years, however, several members of the clergy and laity of the Anglican Church set forth the plea that the practice of the Catholic Church in insisting on unconditionally ordaining clerical converts from Anglicanism arose from want of due inquiry into the validity of Anglican orders, and from mistaken assumptions which, in the light of certain historical investigations, could not justly be maintained. Those, especially, who were interested in the movement that looked toward Corporate Reunion thought that, as a condition to such reunion, Anglican orders should be accepted as valid by the Catholic Church. A few Catholic writers, also, thinking that there was at least room for doubt, joined with them in seeking a fresh inquiry into the question and an authoritative judgment from the Pope. His Holiness Pope Leo XIII, therefore, permitted the question to be re-examined. He commissioned a number of men, whose opinions on the matter were known to be divergent, to state, each, the ground of his judgment, in writing. Pope Leo XIII then summoned them to Rome, directed them to interchange writings and placing at their disposal all the documents available, directed them to further investigate and discuss the issue. Thus prepared, he ordered them to meet in special sessions. Twelve such sessions were held, in which “all were invited to free discussion”. He then directed that the acts of those sessions, together with all the documents, should be submitted to a council of cardinals, “so that when all had studied the whole subject and discussed it in our presence each might give his opinion”. 16 The final result was the edict Apostolicae Curae, in which Anglican orders were declared to be invalid. The judgment remains today and was reaffirmed in 1988 by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who later became Pope Benedict XVI.

Relationships with the Protestant Churches

In 1915, Pope Benedict XV approved a British legation to the Vatican as an attempt at ecumenical dialogue. With the start of World War I, the British were concerned about the possible German and Austrian influences over Vatican policy. The Malines Conversation informally explored the corporate reunion between the Catholic Church and the Church of England. The legation was led by an Anglican and a Catholic, but by 1925 the potential reunion in the Malines Conversations failed. In spite of the failure, the spread of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity occurred and visits with the Bishop of Chichester and the Cardinal of Milan, later Pope Paul VI began.17

In 1960, Archbishop Geoffrey Fisher, of Canterbury, visited the Vatican under the ecumenical leadership of Pope John XXIII. The Pope founded the “Secretariat for the Promotion of Christian Unity” as a meaningful means of ecumenism. Thereafter, the Bishop of Ripon, John Moorman, led a delegation of Anglican observers to the Second Vatican Council. In 1966, Archbishop of Canterbury Michael Ramsey made an official visit to Pope Paul VI. In 1967 the Anglican-Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) was established. The Commission concentrated on the authority of the Bible, and yielded nine statements of agreement. In 1981, phase one of the ARCIC work ended with the publication of a final report entitled, “Elucidations on Authority in the Church.” Phase II of the ARCIC has been ongoing since 1983. In 2004, statements of agreement on Marian theology were published by the ARCIC. The Anglican Church was referred to as “our beloved sister Church” by Pope Paul VI. A different light on the Anglican Church was noted by Cardinal Ratzinger in A.D.2000, when he stated he did not agree with the use of the term “sister Church” with any but the Orthodox Churches. 18

In the 1980s a dialogue was established between the Lutheran and the Roman Catholic Church. The leaders have had 11 rounds of discussions. One major publication, a joint doctrine of justification was published in 1999, entitled, the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. Current discussions are focusing on the doctrines associated with eternal life.19

Relationships with the World Council of Churches

The Catholic Church is not a member of the World Council of Churches (WCC), although Catholic theologians are members of the Commission of the WCC. As a participant, the Catholic Church faith was heard in the 1982 WWC publication of one of the most important ecumenical papers, Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry.20  The document found common grounds on critical Christian  traditions, i.e., the rite of initiation, or Baptism; the sacrament of the Eucharist; and the nature of Holy Orders. Naturally, differences occurred within the WCC’s participants and all the Churches were asked to express their reaction to the ecumenical document of Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry. Each Church was also asked to indicate the implications of the document on their faith in order to have the issues discussed at future WCC conferences on Faith and Order.  

Outcomes, Concerns and the Current State of the Ecumenical Movement

A total of eight major documents on the ecumenical movement in the Catholic Church have been written and promulgated. See Table 1.

TABLE 1: Ecumenical Documents of the Catholic Church

Pre-Second Vatican Council Post-Second Vatican Council
Quanta Cura and Syllabus Errorum1864 by Pope Pius IX Unitatis Redintegratio1964 by Second Vatican Council/Pope Paul VI
Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae1899 by Pope Leo XIII Ut Unum Sint1987 by Pope John Paul II
Mortalium Animos1928 by Pope Pius XI The Balamand Declaration1993 by Pope John Paul II
Humani Generis1950 by Pope Pius XII Dominus Iesus2000 by Pope John Paul II

Quanta Cura and Syllabus Errorum was issued by Pope Pius IX in 1864 to combine earlier papal documents. The document condemned latitudinarism, which held that matters of doctrine, liturgical practices and ecclesiastical organizations were of little importance. Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae was an encyclical by Pope Leo XIII in 1899 that stated that American Catholics were to avoid full assimilation or ecumenical overtures towards Protestants. The encyclical Mortalium Animos by Pope Pius XI in 1928 denounced the dream of a “federation of Christians in which each member retains his own opinions…in matters of Faith,” and stated that the only ecumenism allowed was that which had the goal of converting the world to Catholicism.21

In 1950 Humani Generis by Pope Pius XII spoke of the Church’s Magisterium as the only valid teaching authority. The encyclical provided hope for the Christian faithful in permitting them to engage in empirical research but retain all authority on matters of morality and religion. Unitatis Redintegratio was a decree dealing with ecumenism handed down in 1964 by the Second Vatican Council under Pope Paul VI. The decree was the first conciliar document ever to deal with Catholic ecumenical efforts towards wards both Orthodox and Protestant believers. Ut Unum Sint (that they may be one) was an encyclical by Pope John Paul II in 1987 that provided a commitment by the Catholic Church to ecumenism where Christ calls all disciples to unity in light of the approaching turn of the century. 22

The Balamand Declaration was ratified in 1993 by the Joint International Commission for  Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church. Under Pope John Paul II, the document was the official teaching of the Church and  had the goal of creating a dialogue towards the re-establishment of full communion between the Catholic and Orthodox Churches. Dominus Iesus was published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under Pope John Paul II in A.D. 2000. Dominus Iesus was on the unicity and salvific universality of Jesus Christ and the Church.  The document affirmed that  Christian mystery  overcomes all barriers of time and space, and accomplishes the unity of the human family.

The ecumenical movement in the Catholic Church has increased her faithfulness to Christ’s call for unity between His people. The movement has resulted in changed hearts and a new openness towards pure love and selflessness that arises with a change of heart. According to the 1964 document, Unitatis Redintegratio (UR), “We should therefore pray to the Holy Spirit for the grace to be genuinely self-denying, humble, gentle in the service of others, and to have an attitude of brotherly generosity towards them…”23 The Gospel of St John speaks about the sins of our separation, “If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.”20 We must humbly pray for forgiveness from God for our separated brothers, just as Christ forgives our trespasses against others.23   Ut Unum Sint (UUS) points out that misgivings from the past have left a long-standing burden on Christian unity. The ecumenical movement must be grounded in prayer and the conversions of hearts that will foster mutual forgiveness and reconciliation from past pains and regrets.24

In ecumenical conferences, Catholic theologians have stood by the teaching of the Church while knowing there are still divine mysteries that separate brothers in Christ. Any fruitful discussions required love of truth, charity and humility. The Catholic faith has a hierarchy of truths that often differ from Protestants. This difference produces fraternal rivalry while presenting a clearer understanding of the vast riches of Christ.23  UUS maintains that the unity of Christians will be obtained only if the total content of the faith is revealed. Compromises in faith are contradictions to a God who is Truth, so that no legitimate reconciliation in the body of Christ can occur at the expense of truth. Doctrine needs to be presented in a manner that is understandable to others and as God intended.24 The Catholic Church hopes in UR that the obstacles to perfect ecclesiastical communion be overcome, so that all Christians can celebrate a common Eucharist. The Catholic position is that this unity subsists in her, she will never lose it and hopes it will increase until the return of our Lord.23

Conclusion

The current level of commitment to ecumenism at local levels and throughout the Catholic Church has grown in intensity and extension. The Catholic Church is a full member of three regional Councils of Churches and a member of 14 national Christian Councils. In a global perspective, most Christians and Churches feel a need to overcome the state of division between them. The Post-Second Vatican Council world has changed much with a new realism on the restoration of unity of the faithful based on supported doctrinal truths and serious dialogue between divided Christians. Christian spirituality based on hope and courage has allowed ecumenism to flourish. Pope Francis I has clearly demonstrated his commitment to ecumenism. In his first ecumenical meeting in March 2013, the new pope greeted representatives from Christian Churches and other religions, including Jewish and Muslim leaders. Pope Francis stated that he intends to follow “on the path of ecumenical dialogue” set for the Catholic Church by the Second Vatican Council (A.D.1962-65).25

References:

  1. Guidelines for the Reception of Communion. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, 1996.
  2. Holy Bible, The New Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition. (Nashville, TN:  Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1993).
  3. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. United States Catholic Catechism for Adults. Washington, D.C.: USCC Publishing Services, 2006.
  4. Orlando O., Nickoloff J. An Introductory Dictionary of Theology and Religious Studies, p.439. Liturgical Press, 2007.
  5. Union of Christendom. Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. 1913.
  6. The  Holy See- Vatican,                  (http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html), 1964, accessed March 12, 2013.
  7. Ocariz F. Christ’s Church Subsists in the Catholic Church, (http://www.ewtn.com/library/Doctrine/subsistit.htm), 2005, accessed March 20, 2013.
  8. Code of Canon Law. (http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0017/_P37.HTM), 2007. accessed March 21, 2013.
  9. The Holy See-Vatican. The Profession of Faith. (www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p123a9p3.htm )2006, accessed March 21, 2013.
  10. Fairchild M. Eastern Orthodox Church Denomination.                                                  (http://christianity.about.com/od/easternorthodoxy/p/orthodoxprofile.htm)2013,2013, accessed 21 March 2013.
  11. Green. B. Nestorius and Cyril:  5th Century Christological Division and Recent Progress in Reconciliation. Villanova University,                                                         (http://concept.journals.villanova.edu/article/download/259/223). 2002, accessed 22 March 2013.
  12. Longenecker, D. Catholics and Anglicans. http://www.dwightlongenecker.com/content/pages/articles/catholicIssues/CanterburryAndRomeRevised.asp). n.d. accessed 22 March 2013.
  13. Greene J. Between Damnation and Starvation: Priest and Merchants in Newfoundland Politics, 1745-1855, McGill Queens University Press. 1745-1855. 1999.
  14. O’Riordan, Michael. “Apostolicae Curae.” The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907. 11 Apr. 2013. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01644a.htm), accessed 23 March 2013.
  15. Answer of the Archbishops of England to the Apostolic Letter of Pope Leo XIII (Saepius Officio). Longmans, Green, and Co. New York: 1897.
  16. Pope Leo XIII, Bull Apostolicae Curae, On the Nullity of Anglican Orders, 15 September 1896.
  17. Halifax, L. The Conversation of Malines: 1921-1925. Allan Press: London: 1930.
  18. Ratzinger, J. Theological Highlights of Vatican II. New York: Thomas P. Rausch, SJ, 2009.
  19. Lutheran World Federation and the Catholic Church. Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification, accessed March 23, 2013,                                                                                         http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_31101999_cath-luth-joint-declaration_en.html.
  20. World Council of Churches. Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry. Faith and order paper no. 111, Geneva: World Council of Churches, 1982.
  21. The  Holy See- Vatican, Ut Unum Sint, accessed March 24, 2013,http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents.
  22. The Holy See- Vatican, Humani Generis, accessed March 24, 2013, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html. 
  23. The Holy See- Vatican, Unitatis Redintegratio, accessed March 24, 2013, http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19641121_unitatis-redintegratio_en.html.
  24. The Holy See- Vatican, Ut Unum Sint, accessed March 24, 2013, http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25051995_ut-unum-sint_en.html.
  25. Kenny. P, Pope Forges Closer Ties with Orthodox after Meeting Patriarch. Ecumenical News, March 20, 2013, accessed March 24, 2013, http://www.ecumenicalnews.com/article/pope-forges-closer-ties-with-orthodox-after-meeting-patriarch-21908.

The post The Ecumenical Movement In The Catholic Church: A Historical Review And Analysis appeared first on Catholic Journal.

(5)

A Hall of Famer and generous giver

This is a syndicated post from CNA Daily News. [Read the original article...]

Detroit, Mich., May 25, 2013 / 01:11 pm (CNA).- When a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame is talking, you expect to hear plenty of stories from his days on the playing field.

That’s a logical assumption to make, unless the former player is Joe DeLamielleure. The day that he was interviewed for this story, he had spoken to school kids.

Today’s National Football League, of course, is a lot different from when he played for the Buffalo Bills and Cleveland Browns over a 13-year career that spanned the 1970s and 80s.

“The NFL became ‘entertainment’ once it got to be the 1990s,” says the former offensive lineman. “You weren’t going to be rich the rest of your life before that. Guys were going to work in the offseason.”

So what did he say to the students two days ago, then?

“I tell kids, ‘If you think fame and fortune are the most important things, think…who won the Oscar two years ago?  Who won the Super Bowl two years ago?’ And then I say, ‘Who’s your best friend? Who was your favorite teacher?’ … Fame is fleeting, it comes and goes. Character and friends last forever. If you think sports is the answer, look at people who played sports and where are they now? O.J. (Simpson): Jail. Lawrence Taylor: Went to jail, but is out now.”

Let the record show that DeLamielleure was one of running back Simpson’s blockers when he ran wild for the Bills, including being the first to hit 2,000 yards rushing, in a 14-game season. That was a part of what led “Joe D.” to eventually be enshrined in Canton, Ohio. And once he got there?

“I decided if I got in the Hall of Fame I’d use it as a platform to get some information out to the public.”

In reality, the now 62-year old seems to be talking more from a pulpit. That is, when he’s not busy helping. And in ways that far exceed talking to kids at a school.

Four years ago, DeLamielleure and two of his teammates from college rode bicycles from the football stadium at Michigan State University to Matamoros, Mexico, to raise funds for an orphanage that one of the three founded there.

Two months from now (beginning on July 13) the first round pick by the Bills in 1973 will begin walking from Buffalo to Canton for Grace’s Lamp. The next month (on Aug. 19) he and other NFL colleagues will be in Chicago to participate in a golf tournament for the orphanage in Mexico. He has also participated in "Taste of the NFL." Held in conjunction with the Super Bowl, proceeds from that initiative benefit food banks in every NFL city.

He can point directly to where this generous spirit came from.

“When I grew up (in Center Line, Michigan) we had ten kids in the family. Factories all around. All the neighbors always shared. Everybody’s house was everybody’s house. Someone outgrew a shirt and brought it to a neighbor. We shared meals. My father-in-law was a big worker with St. Vincent de Paul. Our family, we didn’t have a lot but what we had we shared with everyone. I thought we were rich; we never wanted for anything. You learned to share from being in a big Catholic neighborhood.

“I was brought up with all this. It was always such a big part of our lives. If we had a thunderstorm at night, my mom would wake everybody up and say the Rosary so we’d be safe. Fifteen minutes later when the storm would end she’d say, ‘see?!’ In May, Mary’s month, we had to come in at 7:30 and kneel down and say the Rosary along with the radio. Even if we were outside playing.”

Not coincidentally, DeLamielleure says that he’s “a big Rosary guy,” adding, “I’m holding one in my hand right now while we’re talking.”

Noting that he has another interview the day after this one, DeLamielleure says that, “I always say God don’t let me talk, talk through me.”

His faith even played a part in what college he ended up going to.

“Duffy Daugherty (head coach from Michigan State) came to my house and looked around and saw all these rosaries and candles. The next time he came he brought Fr. Lambert with him. My dad said, ‘That’s it, you’re going to Michigan State.’ Duffy told my parents, ‘If he comes Catholic, he leaves Catholic.’”

But then he graduated from Michigan State, got drafted, and instead of blocking, found what would be a temporary block in his way, although he used it to perform a spiritual self-audit.

“I flunked my physical when I got drafted by the Bills. They said there was a problem with my heart. My wife and I were scared. They found out I could play, but, during that four-week period, my wife said, ‘No big deal, you could coach or do something else.’ It had no bearing on her. My brother Darryl, who just passed away last month and was a great Christian, said I needed a new heart. He said it was a wake-up call to keep my heart pure and clear. It’s not about material things. I realized you can’t have a hardened heart.”

So now he takes regular doses of Catholicism, attending Mass every day.

“I always loved the time of just being alone with God. I always thought that when I go to Mass I try to listen to the readings a lot better during the week. So I listen real intently to the words. The bottom line to me is Jesus came here to serve and by serving and have people watch Him they follow Him. What other person since the beginning of time has been number one that long?  He has won all the Super Bowls. If you believe in God and serve him and do what he says to do in the Bible, you won the game.”

Posted with permission from the Catholic Sports Association, an organization dedicated to highlighting Catholic sports professionals and enriching junior high and high school student-athletes with Catholic sports articles, conferences, a Web series, and other programs.

(8)

Episcopal Ordination, Oakland, California

This is a syndicated post from The Chant Café. [Read the original article...]

Today, Saturday at 2 pm EDT, 11 am PDT, the livestream is available here for the episcopal ordination in Oakland.

(8)

Round-up of Pope’s Early Morning Homilies This Week

This is a syndicated post from The Daily Register. [Read the original article...]

By Edward Pentin |
Among the themes covered in his early morning homilies this week, Pope Francis preached about the importance of praying courageously, of doing good to all, and how to guard against losing the spiritual salt of one’s faith.

On… (5)

Dignity of man central to ‘rethinking solidarity,’ says Pope

This is a syndicated post from CNA Daily News. [Read the original article...]

Vatican City, May 25, 2013 / 10:15 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Speaking to an international group dedicated to promoting education of the Church’s social teaching, Pope Francis called for a new economic view that places the human person at the center.

“We must return to the centrality of man, to a more ethical view of business and human relations, without the fear of losing something,” the Pope said on May 25.

Pope Francis addressed members of the Fondazione Centesimus Annus Pro Pontifice at the end of their three-day conference at the Vatican. Founded by Blessed Pope John Paul II in 1993, the organization is celebrating its 20th anniversary this year.

The Holy Father greeted the members of the international gathering and thanked them for their efforts to promote a greater understanding of the Church’s social doctrine.

He reflected on the theme of the conference, “Rethinking solidarity for employment: the challenges of the 21st century.”

The call to “rethink solidarity” is not a call to challenge Church teaching, but rather to apply it to the new circumstances and situations presented by the ever-changing socio-economic development of the modern world, the Pope said.

It is also an opportunity to deepen reflection on the value of solidarity, a key component of Catholic social teaching which is deeply rooted in the Gospel, he added.

Pointing to the “current economic and social crisis,” Pope Francis explained that rising joblessness makes the task of rethinking solidarity more urgent.

“There is no worse form of material poverty… than that which makes it impossible to earn a living and which deprives someone of the dignity of work,” he stated.

“The current crisis is not only economic and financial, but is rooted in an ethical crisis and anthropology,” the Holy Father observed, noting that all too often, profit and power are turned into “idols,” while the value of the human person is forgotten.

He reiterated the words of his predecessor, Benedict XVI, that the human dimension of the economic sphere must not be forgotten.

He also urged the restoration of solidarity as a “social value,” noting that much of the business and economic world do not hold it in high esteem.

Observing that ethical and economic problems are widespread, Pope Francis stressed that rethinking solidarity will require not only aid to the poor, but also a global reform of the system in ways that respect the inherent rights and dignity of the human person.

(9)

Don’t create sacrament of ‘pastoral customs,’ Pope preaches

This is a syndicated post from CNA Daily News. [Read the original article...]

Vatican City, May 25, 2013 / 06:31 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Pope Francis warned that some Christians establish the eighth sacrament “of pastoral customs” when they insist on protocol instead of seeking to meet spiritual needs.

He made his remarks during his May 25 homily on the Gospel reading from Mark 10 in which the disciples rebuked people who were bringing children to Jesus.

“I remember once, coming out of the city of Salta, on the patronal feast, there was a humble lady who asked for a priest’s blessing,” Pope Francis recalled in the chapel of St. Martha’s House.

“The priest said, ‘All right, but you were at the Mass’ and explained the whole theology of blessing in the Church. You did well: ‘Ah, thank you father, yes father,’ said the woman. When the priest had gone, the woman turned to another priest: ‘Give me your blessing!’

“All these words did not register with her,” the Pope underscored, “because she had another necessity: the need to be touched by the Lord. That is the faith that we always look for, this is the faith that brings the Holy Spirit. We must facilitate it, make it grow, help it grow.”

He also pointed to the story of the blind man of Jericho, who was rebuked by the disciples because he cried out, “Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!”

“The Gospel says that they didn’t want him to shout, they wanted him not to shout but he wanted to shout more, why? Because he had faith in Jesus! The Holy Spirit had put faith in his heart. And they said, ‘No, you cannot do this! You don’t shout to the Lord. Protocol does not allow it.’”

Pope Francis also used a more modern example by describing an encounter of a young couple with a parish secretary.

“‘Good morning, the two of us – boyfriend and girlfriend – we want to get married,’” the couple says.

“And instead of saying, ‘That's great!’ They say, ‘Oh, well, have a seat. If you want the Mass, it costs a lot … .’ This, instead of receiving a good welcome – ‘It is a good thing to get married!’ – But instead they get this response: ‘Do you have the certificate of baptism, all right … .’ And they find a closed door,” the Pope said.

He described the situation as one where a “Christian has the ability to open a door, thanking God for this fact of a new marriage” but instead the secretary controlled the faith when it was possible to have facilitated the couples’ faith.

“There is always a temptation,” he said, “to try and take possession of the Lord.”

Before finishing his homily, Pope Francis painted one final scenario, that of a single mother who wants to have her child baptized.

“Think about a single mother who goes to church, in the parish and to the secretary she says: ‘I want my child baptized.’

“And then this Christian, this Christian says: ‘No, you cannot because you're not married!’

“But look, this girl who had the courage to carry her pregnancy and not to return her son to the sender, what is it? A closed door! This is not zeal! It is far from the Lord! It does not open doors!

“And so when we are on this street, we have this attitude, we do not do good to people, the people, the People of God. But Jesus instituted the seven sacraments, (and) with this attitude and we are establishing the eighth: the sacrament of pastoral customs!” he warned.

The Pope noted, “Jesus is indignant when he sees these things” because those who suffer are “his faithful people, the people that he loves so much.”

He concluded his homily by asking everyone to think about “the Holy People of God, a simple people, who want to get closer to Jesus and we think of so many Christians of goodwill who are wrong and that instead of opening a door they close the door of goodwill … So we ask the Lord that all those who come to the Church find the doors open, find the doors open, open to meet this love of Jesus. We ask this grace.”

 

(14)

Mark Steyn on the Slaughter in Woolwich

This is a syndicated post from The American Catholic. [Read the original article...]

I wish I had something cheerier to start the Memorial Day weekend, but Mark Steyn, as usual, knocks it out of the park with his weekend column. This passivity set the tone for what followed. In London as in Boston, the politico-media class immediately lapsed into the pneumatic multiculti Tourette’s that seems to be a [...]

(14)

Ariz. abortion law hoped to win Supreme Court support

This is a syndicated post from CNA Daily News. [Read the original article...]

Phoenix, Ariz., May 25, 2013 / 06:03 am (CNA/EWTN News).- The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against an Arizona law banning abortions after 20 weeks, but backers of the measure are hopeful that the case will result in a favorable Supreme Court decision.

“The decision from the Ninth Circuit was expected, but is nonetheless disappointing,” Ronald Johnson, executive director of the Arizona Catholic Conference, told CNA May 23.

“I have always felt that the United States Supreme Court would have the last word on this case. There is also some comfort in knowing that the Ninth Circuit is the most overturned circuit in the country.”

A three-judge panel from the federal appeals court unanimously said the law violated both Roe v. Wade and the 2007 decision Gonzales v. Carhart.

“Arizona simply cannot proscribe a woman from choosing to obtain an abortion before the fetus is viable,” the panel said.

Gov. Jan Brewer signed the law in April 2012. It barred abortions after 20 weeks into pregnancy, excepting only medical emergencies that threaten the life of the mother. A federal district judge upheld the law in July, the Arizona Republic reports.

Cathi Herrod, President of the Center for Arizona Policy, charged that the Ninth Circuit decision disregarded evidence that proves unborn children can feel pain in the womb at 20 weeks or later.

“The court put a pro-abortion ideology before the health and safety of women and preborn children,” Herrod said May 21. “The court held to the vague standard that abortions can only be limited based on whether the child is viable, even though they confessed viability is not a ‘fixed’ point.”

State Sen. Kimberly Yee, a Phoenix Republican who sponsored the bill, said she is optimistic that the Supreme Court will take up the case.

Yee, who herself is 20 weeks pregnant, referred to her own pregnancy. “Without a doubt, this is life,” she said.

Supporters of the court’s decision include attorney Janet Crepps of the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights.

She said constitutional law protects the right to choose abortion up to the point of the viability of the unborn child.

“The state can’t cross that line, it can’t fudge that line,” Crepps told the Arizona Republic.

Maricopa County Attorney General Bill Montgomery said he will appeal to the Supreme Court. He said the law is an opportunity for the court to consider other issues than viability alone, including arguments based on advances in medical technology that provide evidence that unborn babies can feel pain. He said the court can also consider the health risk to women from abortions performed after 20 weeks.

However, the Supreme Court must first decide to hear the case.

Johnson said Arizona’s partial-birth abortion ban remains in effect. The state has several other pro-life laws that require informed consent and a 24-hour waiting period for women considering abortions.

“These laws are making a difference in reducing the number of abortions and protecting unborn babies,” he said.

The Arizona court case comes after Philadelphia abortionist Kermit Gosnell was convicted on three counts of first-degree homicide for killing babies born alive. Recent news stories have focused attention on allegations that Texas abortionist Douglas Karpen delivered late-term babies and killed them in gruesome ways.

Johnson said he believes that these controversies surrounding these cases “have helped expose the inhumanity that occurs within the abortion industry.”

“It also shows that while good laws are important, more needs to be done to make sure that pro-life laws are being followed,” he said.

(16)

May 25 – Homily: Ask Mary To Send Her Spouse

This is a syndicated post from Uploads by AirMaria.com. [Read the original article...]

May is dedicated to Our Lady, and concluding the octave of Pentecost, we ask Mary, the spiritual Mother of all souls, to send Her Spouse, the Holy Spirit, to…
Views:
1
0
ratings
Time:
02:27
More in
People & Blogs

(11)

Hide me
Sign up below to have the hottest Catholic news delivered to your email daily!
Enter your email address:
Show me